5G: An EXTINCTION EVENT Too Far!

5G planet pic

Image originally published on www.takebackyourpower.net

Why is the proposed 5G rollout being called an EXTINCTION EVENT by opponents?

And when I say opponents, I am talking about highly regarded doctors, scientists and signatories to extraordinary 2017 documents such as the 5G APPEAL (180 scientists and doctors, including several Australian signatories), and the INTERNATIONAL APPEAL TO STOP 5G ON EARTH AND IN SPACE.

GRASSROOTS OPPOSITION

On a more local level, councils throughout the world are attempting to stop the installation of 5G cell transmitters. All are upset that federal authorities control the 5G antenna installations despite the fact that the council owns the land on behalf of the residents. Here is a small sampler of government, court and council-driven campaigns:

  • Portland Oregon City, 24 march 2019 mayor and 2 commissioners opposed 5G installation
  • Florence Italy and Roman Distric XII, 28 march 2019, advocated the precautionary principle, and were critical of ICNIRP contradictions
  • Brussells 1 April 2019 Environment minister Celine Fremault halted 5G plans “The people of Brussels are not guinea pigs whose health I can sell at a profit. We cannot leave anything to doubt”.
  • Netherlands House of Representatives demanded research 4 April 2019
  • California Supreme Court Justices unanimously insisted on permits for 5G small cell antennas infrastructure 5 april 2019
  • German parliament is ready to suspend 5G rollout based on petition saying “scientifically justified doubts about the safety of this technology”, 8 April 2019
  • Switzerland’s 3rd largest region called for a moratorium on 5G, 9 April while 4 major regions representing 1.5 million citizens, called for a stop (failed, over-ruled by Telcos who simply bypassed it by upgrading existing antenna for 4G (20 April 2019)
  • Geneva declared a moratorium and called on WHO to do independent research for harmful effects, 11 April 2019
  • The Blue Mountains, Australia: Katoomba council voted unanimously to acknowledge serious community concerns over the coming rollout of 5G technology. Mayor Mark Greenhill promised to write to various government ministers for more information
  • Ryde, Sydney: Spokesperson Sue Cappadonna collected signatures from 100 residents of Ryde to remove small cell 4G antennas (later to be upgraded to 5G technology). She said ‘We don’t want it here, it causes us great anxiety that this thing is going to be running 24/7”.

SO WHAT – ON EARTH – IS 5G TECHNOLOGY?

5G is the 5th generation wireless communication network, coming on the heels of 4G LTE, our current technology. 1G gave us voice only, 2G gave us voice and text. 3G didn’t appear until 20 years later, giving us data for websites and emails. 4G gave us faster data and more calls simultaneously. 4G LTE is essentially the same as 4G but using a higher frequency of 2-8 GHz, as opposed to the 1.8-2.5 GHz of 3G.

2G through to 4G LTE Cell Towers have a constant ambient baseline for their 800-1000 Watt-beams i.e. they transmit in one direction from left to right –for example – 10 o’clock to 2 o’clock. As lower frequencies, they are considered centimetre wavelengths, and as such, can easily pass through buildings and foliage in the split-second journey from tower to mobile phone or wireless device and back again.

In other words, 2G – 4G tranmitters have 1 single antenna – from the Cell Tower – broadcasting over a wide area.

CONSUMER SWITCH TO MOBILE PHONE DATA

Since the consumer switch from personal computers to mobile phones for daily data consumption, the 4G Cell Towers are apparently stretched to the limit. So the grand plan from the telecommunications companies is to initiate 5G technology, to work alongside the existing 4G.

5G will initially use the current 4G infrastructure but the bizzare jump from centimetre waves to millimetre waves requires new mini Cell Towers in ‘phased arrays’ every 2-10 homes within the urban areas. This is because the higher frequencies of 5G, from 6 GHz – 100 GHz, although having a latency speed measured in milliseconds, will not be able to penetrate buildings and foliage, as the lower <10 GHZ frequencies do.

So far, I’m describing the Earth base stations for 5G technology! These small cell antennas will be arranged in phased arrays, every 2-10 homes apart, emitting 30,000 Watts per 100 MHz of Radiofrequency spectrum. 5G will emit frequencies 100 x higher than the current 4G lower frequencies.

What’s more, they will not be restricted to the 10 o’clock – 2 o’clock constant ambient baseline of beam. They will be BEAM-FORMED i.e. focused, steerable, laser-like beams that track each other in all directions. There will be ricocheting and an aggregation effect from so many Cell Towers going in so many directions simultaneously.

MIMO: MANY INPUTS, MANY OUTPUTS

4G Cell Towers currently have an average of 12 ports whereas the 5G mini Cell transmitters will have 100 ports in what is technically described as MIMO, Many Inputs, Many Outputs for the following proposed purposes:

1) higher data transferNappy IoT

2) driverless cars

3) The Internet of things IoT (the nappy image shows a wireless transmitter being attached to the baby’s nappy to detect when it is ‘dirty’ and needs changing!)

4) faster video downloads

5) military applications.

An example of MIMO is the planned 5G mobile phone that will have dozens of tiny antennas sending out narrowly focused beams towards the nearest cell tower less than 25 feet from the home. Back and forth will ricochet these steerable beams for quick video downloads in seconds – not minutes – per 1000 people per metre.

SO WHAT – IN SPACE – IS 5G TECHNOLOGY DOING?

5G wavelengths will not penetrate buildings, and it is not feasible to put a satellite under the roof of a building. The roof would block the higher GHz wavelengths. So there are plans to launch 20,000 satellites into Space to help the 5G beam-formed signals get through buildings.

Let me repeat that for you:

5 COMPANIES PLAN TO LAUNCH 20,000 SATELLITES INTO SPACE TO IRRADIATE AREAS OF EARTH NOT COVERED BY GROUND TRANSMITTERS, AND HELP THE 5G BEAM-FORMED SIGNALS GET THROUGH BUILDINGS!

The Space satellites will emit 5 million Watts from the thousands of antennas.

Signatories from the THE 5G APPEAL document object to the ‘massive increase of MANDATORY EXPOSURE to wireless radiation’. There will literally be no place on Earth to escape the 5G EMF wireless radiation!

THE INTERNET OF THINGS IoT

Meanwhile the plans for driverless cars and suchlike will create 10-20 billion antenna connections among the IoT fridges, washing machines, surveillance cameras, self-driving cars and buses, nappies etc.

AUSTRALIA: OPTUS, TELSTRA and SAMSUNG

In Australia, OPTUS has been contracted to rollout the new 5G Home Broadband Package while Telstra has partnered with Samsung to rollout 5G Mobile Phones.

LACK OF INDEPENDENT REAL-WORLD RESEARCH

All the 5G research has been thus far conducted in a laboratory. Senator Richard Blumenthal grilled BIG WIRELESS agents about the research in a U.S. Senate Hearing, only to find that the telcos had put aside $0 for research into safety. He was appalled to discover that – despite investing a phenomenal amount of money into 5G already – there were no independent studies on the health and safety risks!

SCHUMANN RESONANCE

The 2020 planned Space deployment of 20,000 transmitting satellites into the ionosphere has prompted robust discussion of the Schumann Resonance.

The Schumann Resonance is a finely tuned resonance in the D-layer of the electrically charged ionosphere in Space, that is tuned to 7.83 Hz, the same as our Hearts (7.83 Hz) and Brains (8-12 Hz). This Schumann Resonance will be disrupted by the digital interference of 5G satellite technology.

Devastating health effects could involve lowered Melatonin – affecting sleep, mood, cognitive ability and energy. The Magnetite in the Brain – normally protective in the presence of Radiation – would be adversely affected. The magnetite functions of Haemoglobin-binding may be affected. Calcium leakage from Radiation damage – especially in the Blood/Brain barrier – would allow in free radicals and toxins. Oxidative damage to Neurons is a possibility.

John Patterson, a leading Australian radiation expert and activist, says that the digital disruption to the Schumann Resonance may potentially affect the spin of polarity of the body’s cells. ‘The body is like a spinning top charged through nature’s fields and waves.’

He says Radiation enters our bodies in the same way that light enters our bodies, through our eyes and skin, radiation entering the eyes assisting synchronisation and timing of the brain to the body, and conversely radiation entering the skin assisting time and synchronisation from body organs to the brain.

There is – understandably – huge international disquiet about the unknown effects of 5G technology.

Even weather satellites may be disrupted by having to share the radio spectrum band of 1675-1680 MHz band with 5G satellites in Space. US Weather Meteorologists are loudly demanding protection limits from NASA.

Page 1 of the THE 5G APPEAL document – drafted by scientists and doctors – declares, ‘Damage goes well beyond the human race, as there is growing evidence of harmful effects to both plants and animals’. It is a horror scenario, a potential EXTINCTION EVENT, a catastrophe, an obscenity, a brazen step too far!

References:

  1. Bollinger, Ty ‘Cities Push Back as FCC Expedites Dangerous 5G Networks’ Posted in https://thetruthaboutcancer.com/fcc-5g/ Posted 15 march 2019, Downloaded 19/3/2019
  2. Cousens, Rabbi Gabriel ‘5G-A Toxic Assault on the Planetary Web of Life’ in http://treeoflifecenterus.com/5g-a-toxic-assault-on-the-planetary-web-of-life/?mc_cid=89974299e9&mc_eid=e08ab2e1e6  Posted 31/1/2019, Downloaded 2/3/2019
  3. Green Med Info Reporter, ‘Wireless Industry Confesses: “No Studies Show 5G is Safe” ‘ in http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/wireless-industry-confesses-no-studies-show-5g-safe? Posted 18/2/2019 Downloaded 20/2/2019
  4. Lewis, B C ‘No 5G in the Blue Mountains packs council chamber’ Local News Blue Mountains Gazette 31/1/2019
  5. Maisch, Don ‘Are community concerns over the 5G network rollout based on unfounded anxiety or valid evidence?’ Guest Blog in https://betweenrockand hardplace.wordpress.com/2019/04/25/guest-blog-from-dr-don-maisch-australia-are-community-concerns-over-the-5g-network-rollout-based-on-unfounded-anxiety-or-valid-evidence/ Posted 25/42019, Downloaded 26/4/2019
  6. Moskowitz, Joel ‘New 5G Network Spurs Health Concerns’ in Electromagnetic Radiation Safety Project, Posted 2/4/2019, Downloaded 5/4/2019
  7. Nyberg, Rainer & Hardell, Lennart (Eds) ‘Scientists and doctors warn of potential serious health effects of 5G’ in 5G APPEAL: SCIENTIST APPEAL FOR 5G MORATORIUM document Posted 13/9/2017, Downloaded 2/5/2019
  8. Raper, Ashleigh & Sas, Nick ‘Huawei-made ‘small cell’ boxes hit suburban Sydney, as residents raise health concerns’ in https://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2019-01-07/huawei=small-cell-network-comes-to-sydney/10688124?pfmredir=sm   Downloaded 9/1/2019
  9. The Brussels Times Reporter, ‘Radiation concerns halt Brussels 5G development, for now’ in http://www.brusselstimes.com/brussels/14753/radiation-concerns-halt-brussels-5g-for-now  Posted 1/4/2019, Downloaded 5/4/2019
  10. Trower, Barrie ‘WiFi Report – Humanity At The Brink’ in GeoEngineering Watch website, more info: emrrfsa.org Posted 13/9/2013, Downloaded 1/5/ 2019
0

Republishing LEGAL NOTICE for urgent distribution to EMF-aware consumers

radiation symbol pic

NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONSUMER

DATE

 

(Electricity Retailer)

AGL Energy Limited

Level 22

101 Miller Street

NORTH SYDNEY NSW 2060

 

(Electricity Distributor)

cc Energex Limited

GPO Box 1461

BRISBANE Q 4001

 

SENT BY REGISTERED MAIL

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

Regarding: Account 4… ….

Service Address: ADDRESS

 

NOTICE OF NO CONSENT TO TRESPASS AND SURVEILLANCE
NOTICE OF LIABILITY

Be advised, you and all other parties are hereby denied consent for installation and use of any and all smart meters or digital meters or any other surveillance and activity monitoring device, or devices, at the above property.

Any ‘implied consent’ is hereby withdrawn for the installation and use of any surveillance and activity monitoring device that sends and receives communications technology. Informed consent is legally required for installation of any surveillance device and any device that will collect and transmit private and personal data to undisclosed and unauthorised parties for undisclosed and unauthorised purposes. Authorisation for sharing of personal and private information may only be given by the originator and subject of that information. That authorisation is hereby denied and refused with regard to the above property and all its occupants, as signified by the directions clearly marked on our meter box and surrounds.

Until you can provide a manually read ‘interval’ meter and clearly demonstrate that it does not utilise remote communication via the use of a powerful wireless device next to my residence or office, I will not consider the replacement of the existing analogue meter. Until that time, consent is withdrawn for the following reasons.

Smart meters violate the law and cause endangerment to residents by the following factors:

  1. Electro-Magnetic and Radio Frequency energy contamination as emitted by smart metersis a Class 2 carcinogen according to the World Health Organisation, and has been proven in numerous peer-reviewed scientific studies to cause severe adverse health and biological effects.

http://www.pentictonwesternnews.com/opinion/307010961.html

http://www.stopsmartmeters.org.nz/uncategorized/unpleasant-symptoms-after-smart-meter-installation/

http://www.magdahavas.com/austrian-medical-association-guidelines-to-diagnosing-and-treating-patients-with-electrohypersensitivity/

http://www.wireless-health.org.br/downloads/LatinAmericanScienceReviewReport.pdf

https://www.scribd.com/collections/3440803/Electrosmog-Bibiographies

  1. This unacceptable health damage extends to all animals, wildlife and plants.https://www.scribd.com/document/63829925/Is-Electrosmog-hurting-our-wildlife-149-references
  1. Smart meters invade privacy in the following unacceptable ways:
  • They individually identify electrical devices inside the home and record when they are operated.
  • They monitor household activity and occupancy in violation of rights and domestic security.
  • They transmit wireless signals which may be intercepted by unauthorised and unknown parties. Those signals can be used to monitor behaviour and occupancy and they can be used by criminals to aid criminal activity against the occupants.
  • They allow data about occupant’s daily habits and activities to be collected, recorded and stored in permanent databases which are accessed by parties not authorized or invited to know and share that private data by those whose activities were recorded.
  1. Lloyds of London does not cover health damage from EMF radiation, as per Exclusion 32, so it is unlikely that our public liability insurance would cover people visiting the house in the event of smart meter radiation damage. Anysmart meter installation would leave us vulnerable to lawsuits and real financial damage.
  1. Smart meters are a fire risk.

http://www.emraware.com/opposition.html#sthash.hXEiqHNh.dpuf

  1. I refer you to several Australian High Court rulings on Smart Meter Trespass which puts the liability on your meter installer should he/she ‘wilfully avoid’ this clearly communicated request based by us, the legal occupants, on soundly researched and thoroughly understood contemporary legal, safety, insurance and scientific arguments.
  • Kuru v State of New South Wales [2008] HCA 26 (12 June 2008)
  • New South Wales v Ibbett [2006] HCA 57; (2006) 231 ALR 485; (2006) 81 ALJR 427 (12 December 2006)
  • Plenty v Dillon [1991] HCA 5; (1991) 171 CLR 635 F.C. 91/004 (7 March 1991)
  • George v Rockett [1990] HCA 26; (1990) 170 CLR 104 (20 June 1990)
  • Halliday v Nevill [1984] HCA 80; (1994) 155 CLR 1 (16 December 1984)
  1. Your company has never adequately disclosed the health risks or the particular recording and transmission capabilities of the smart meter, or the extent of the data that will be recorded, stored and shared, or the purposes to which the data will and will not be put.

I forbid, refuse and deny consent of any installation and use of any monitoring, eavesdropping, and surveillance EMF Radioactive devices on my property, my place of residence and my place of occupancy. Any prior ‘implied consent’ between myself and AGL or Energex is hereby revoked.

That applies to and includes smart meters and surveillance and activity monitoring devices of any and all kinds and connecting devices including the ZigBee module. Any attempt to install any such device directed at me, other occupants, my property or residence will constitute trespass, stalking, wiretapping and unlawful surveillance and endangerment of health and safety, all prohibited and punishable by law through criminal and civil complaints. All persons, government agencies and private organisations responsible for installing or operating monitoring devices directed at or recording my activities, which I have not specifically authorised in writing, will be fully liable for any violations, intrusions, harm or negative consequences caused or made possible by those devices.

This is a LEGAL NOTICE. After this delivery, I will keep a copy of this registered letter of NOTICE on my meter box, and the liabilities listed above may not be denied or avoided by parties named and implied in this notice.

 

(You sign here)

 

(Witness signs here)

 

0

11 Steps to REFUSE THE SMART METERS in Brisbane this month

TICK PREFERRED DETOX: 3 MONTH or 6 MONTH Here are the 11 steps:

  1. Confirm the address of both your retailer and distributor from your bill or website (via the electricity distributor look-up tool). For instance, my retailer is AGL and my distributor is Energex (Energex sells wholesale electricity to AGL)

 

  1. Write a Notice letter – see my sample http://www.detoxonline.com.au/copy-this-smartdigital-meter-refusal-notice-and-send-to-agl/ – and post, by registered post, to both companies, ensuring you get a confirmation reply

 

  1. Lock up your analogue meter box with a good lock, one that can’t be cut with bolt-cutters

 

  1. Make the meter data (which belongs to the electricity distributor) accessible to be read

 

  1. Display a sticker – see the 2 samples

 

  1. Display a copy of your Notice in a secure weather-proof way

 

  1. Be wary that it might be called an ‘upgrade’ aka digital/smart meter installation

 

  1. Stay calm if the electricity meter installer harasses you

 

  1. Point out that YOU, as the legal occupant, own the meter box itself (renter or landholder) and have taken appropriate legal steps to protect it

 

  1. Point out that the meter installer is liable for WILFUL AVOIDANCE if he/she continues to attempt to install the ‘digital/smart’ meter against your wishes

 

  1. You have a common law right to protect your property – the meter box – from trespass. You have the right to resist having your possessions modified, devalued or damaged without consent.

WHO OWNS WHAT

THE ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTOR (e.g. Energex) owns the electricity provided by the retailer (AGL).

THE ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTOR also owns the meter itself and the meter data

THE LEGAL OCCUPANT (RENTER OR LANDHOLDER) owns everything else i.e. the wiring, the fuse panel, the metal box and the underlying building structure

 AER WATCHDOG

Don’t be told that you will have to pay an exorbitant fee for the analogue meter readings or have your electricity cut off, in the event of retaining your old analogue meter.

The Australian Energy Regulator (AER) oversees matters relating to the transmission and distribution of electricity in Australia. They have already ruled that consumers wanting to retain their old analogue meters in Victoria can do so, at a reasonable cost determined by the AER (NOT BY THE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTORS OR RETAILERS).

0

D-Day approaches for Qld Smart Meter Refusals

timeline - cropped

Several urgent emails have reached me in the past week, seeking advice on how to refuse the smart meters threatened for installation by the end of August in the Brisbane area.

It’s not an easy thing to do, to lock out an insistent Energex meter installer in the surrounds of your own home or office, in a way that feels un-cooperative to society. But let me remind you that the original brief – as outlined in the Victorian Auditor-General’s report of  2015 – was to replace accumulation meters (analogue meters) with interval meters. Somewhere between the 2004 Essential Services Commission’s decision to mandate the rollout of interval meters and the 2006 program announcement of  a rollout of 2-way communication ‘smart’ digital meters, there was persuasion by industry and a plethora of vested interests. As the Auditor-General’s report states, there was no consultation with the public, ill-prepared cost analyses and no explanation of the sudden departure from the original brief of providing manually read interval meters.

Both industry and government were blinded by the $ signs…

No long-term health studies have been done for these digital meters – they have been here for 5 minutes in the total scheme of things. There is enough doubt to warrant an immediate halt to these powerful 2-way radio transmitters being positioned in everyone’s homes and offices. Please forward this article onto anyone you care about, especially vulnerable children, babies, elderly and sick people who may be more susceptible to Electro-Magnetic Frequency Radiation effects and long-term irreversible sensitivity.

For the 11 steps to refuse a smart meter go to http://www.detoxonline.com.au/11-steps-refuse-smart-meters-brisbane-month/ .

For a sample of the Notice letter, go to http://www.detoxonline.com.au/copy-this-smartdigital-meter-refusal-notice-and-send-to-agl/

For a sample of the REFUSAL sticker to accompany your securely locked meter box, go to http://www.detoxonline.com.au/refusal-notices-meter-box/

3

OPT-OUT of digital smart meters in Q, NSW and SA before it’s too late!

digital meter opt out

No mention of an OPT-OUT

Act urgently if you are EMF-aware and DO NOT WANT A SMART METER thrust upon you in the next few weeks! AGL and other electricity suppliers are blitzing the states of Qld, NSW and SA. While insisting that it is not mandatory, AGL and co. are leaving it up to the consumer to reply forcefully to their letter being sent out with an OPT-OUT response by mail, phone or email within a week or 2 of receipt of the letter (assuming you get the letter and they acknowledge your opt-out submission)! We are in untested waters…

A consumer from Brisbane recently wrote into this blog, saying that AGL had insisted he need an upgrade of the board behind his meter. He was suspicious and when his own Electrician inspected the chipboard, he reported there was nothing wrong with it! This is exactly the type of pretext that may be used to enforce a digital smart meter ‘upgrade’ if you are not wary. As an added precaution, you should lock up your meter box to avoid any problems in the coming month – see my blog on how to do that.

Judging from past experiences of skullduggery – see the Victorian Attorney-General’s damning audit report http://www.audit.vic.gov.au/publications/20150916-Smart-Meters/20150916-Smart-Meters.html – you should be vigilant for all sorts of promises regarding the cost benefits that simply cannot be realised. John Doyle’s comprehensive audit from the Victorian Government concludes that the Victorian smart meter experience was an extremely costly one for Victorian consumers (costing the taxpayer 2.2 billion $ to subsidise the meter change) with a deplorable lack of consumer education about how to maximise any benefits. It ignored the fact that, overall, consumers prefer a fixed rate for their electricity usage. They do not want the ‘flexible pricing’ model whereby a mini radio-station is plonked next to their living rooms beaming out radio signals of usage every few minutes to save them and the electricity companies a few $.

This whole phenomenon started when the government asked corporations about an ‘interval’ meter reading, to save the costs associated with manual meter-reading. Unfortunately the ‘interval’ meter concept quickly transmuted into the ‘digital’ meter concept, without a full cost analysis or community consultation or a long-term health risk analysis.

The public have paid $2.2 billion to subsidise the smart meter rollout in Victoria and any savings have just gone straight back to the power companies who got to sack all the meter readers. The digital smart meters are like radios – they transmit all the data, without the need for meter reading. The problem is that anything that transmits like a radio is highly radioactive and it transmits all day and night without any let-up. Residents are getting 24/7 non-ionising radiation at unacceptably high levels. Don’t regret this, after the fact. Act now to lock up your meter box and be proactive in opting out of the so-called non-mandatory digital meter upgrade.

1

Copy this Smart/Digital Meter REFUSAL NOTICE and send to your Electricity Providers

NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONSUMER

DATE

 

(Electricity Retailer)

AGL Energy Limited

Level 22

101 Miller Street

NORTH SYDNEY NSW 2060

 

(Electricity Distributor)

cc Energex Limited

GPO Box 1461

BRISBANE Q 4001

 

SENT BY REGISTERED MAIL

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

Regarding: Account 4… ….

Service Address: ADDRESS

 

NOTICE OF NO CONSENT TO TRESPASS AND SURVEILLANCE
NOTICE OF LIABILITY

Be advised, you and all other parties are hereby denied consent for installation and use of any and all smart meters or digital meters or any other surveillance and activity monitoring device, or devices, at the above property.

Any ‘implied consent’ is hereby withdrawn for the installation and use of any surveillance and activity monitoring device that sends and receives communications technology. Informed consent is legally required for installation of any surveillance device and any device that will collect and transmit private and personal data to undisclosed and unauthorised parties for undisclosed and unauthorised purposes. Authorisation for sharing of personal and private information may only be given by the originator and subject of that information. That authorisation is hereby denied and refused with regard to the above property and all its occupants, as signified by the directions clearly marked on our meter box and surrounds.

Until you can provide a manually read ‘interval’ meter and clearly demonstrate that it does not utilise remote communication via the use of a powerful wireless device next to my residence or office, I will not consider the replacement of the existing analogue meter. Until that time, consent is withdrawn for the following reasons.

Smart meters violate the law and cause endangerment to residents by the following factors:

  1. Electro-Magnetic and Radio Frequency energy contamination as emitted by smart meters is a Class 2 carcinogen according to the World Health Organisation, and has been proven in numerous peer-reviewed scientific studies to cause severe adverse health and biological effects.

http://www.pentictonwesternnews.com/opinion/307010961.html

http://www.stopsmartmeters.org.nz/uncategorized/unpleasant-symptoms-after-smart-meter-installation/

http://www.magdahavas.com/austrian-medical-association-guidelines-to-diagnosing-and-treating-patients-with-electrohypersensitivity/

http://www.wireless-health.org.br/downloads/LatinAmericanScienceReviewReport.pdf

https://www.scribd.com/collections/3440803/Electrosmog-Bibiographies

  1. This unacceptable health damage extends to all animals, wildlife and plants.

  1. Smart meters invade privacy in the following unacceptable ways:
  • They individually identify electrical devices inside the home and record when they are operated.
  • They monitor household activity and occupancy in violation of rights and domestic security.
  • They transmit wireless signals which may be intercepted by unauthorised and unknown parties. Those signals can be used to monitor behaviour and occupancy and they can be used by criminals to aid criminal activity against the occupants.
  • They allow data about occupant’s daily habits and activities to be collected, recorded and stored in permanent databases which are accessed by parties not authorized or invited to know and share that private data by those whose activities were recorded.
  1. Lloyds of London does not cover health damage from EMF radiation, as per Exclusion 32, so it is unlikely that our public liability insurance would cover people visiting the house in the event of smart meter radiation damage. Any smart meter installation would leave us vulnerable to lawsuits and real financial damage.
  1. Smart meters are a fire risk.

http://www.emraware.com/opposition.html#sthash.hXEiqHNh.dpuf

  1. I refer you to several Australian High Court rulings on Smart Meter Trespass which puts the liability on your meter installer should he/she ‘wilfully avoid’ this clearly communicated request based by us, the legal occupants, on soundly researched and thoroughly understood contemporary legal, safety, insurance and scientific arguments.
  • Kuru v State of New South Wales [2008] HCA 26 (12 June 2008)
  • New South Wales v Ibbett [2006] HCA 57; (2006) 231 ALR 485; (2006) 81 ALJR 427 (12 December 2006)
  • Plenty v Dillon [1991] HCA 5; (1991) 171 CLR 635 F.C. 91/004 (7 March 1991)
  • George v Rockett [1990] HCA 26; (1990) 170 CLR 104 (20 June 1990)
  • Halliday v Nevill [1984] HCA 80; (1994) 155 CLR 1 (16 December 1984)
  1. Your company has never adequately disclosed the health risks or the particular recording and transmission capabilities of the smart meter, or the extent of the data that will be recorded, stored and shared, or the purposes to which the data will and will not be put.

I forbid, refuse and deny consent of any installation and use of any monitoring, eavesdropping, and surveillance EMF Radioactive devices on my property, my place of residence and my place of occupancy. Any prior ‘implied consent’ between myself and AGL or Energex is hereby revoked.

That applies to and includes smart meters and surveillance and activity monitoring devices of any and all kinds and connecting devices including the ZigBee module. Any attempt to install any such device directed at me, other occupants, my property or residence will constitute trespass, stalking, wiretapping and unlawful surveillance and endangerment of health and safety, all prohibited and punishable by law through criminal and civil complaints. All persons, government agencies and private organisations responsible for installing or operating monitoring devices directed at or recording my activities, which I have not specifically authorised in writing, will be fully liable for any violations, intrusions, harm or negative consequences caused or made possible by those devices.

This is a LEGAL NOTICE. After this delivery, I will keep a copy of this registered letter of NOTICE on my meter box, and the liabilities listed above may not be denied or avoided by parties named and implied in this notice.

 

(You sign here)

 

(Witness signs here)

 

 

 

0

Qld, NSW and SA prepares to resist smart meter rollout

WARNING: BE PROACTIVE TO AVOID 50,000 MICROWATTS OF EMF ‘SMART/DIGITAL METER’ MISERY COMING YOUR WAY

 house cartoonAGL, a large Australian electricity retailer, is about to attempt to rollout another mandatory SMART METER rollout in Qld, NSW and SA, even after the abysmal failure of the Victorian rollout. They are so sheepish about it they won’t even refer to the Active Stream meters as ‘smart meters’. They are now calling them ‘digital meters’ to avoid the stigma associated with the disastrous Victorian rollout.

And they are cunning enough to say it is not mandatory with the following excerpt from the AGL Faqs page

https://www.agl.com.au/residential/help-and-support/faqs

  • Q Can I choose not to get a new meter? And how?
    While we think you could benefit from a new digital meter being installed, the choice is yours and you can choose not to.

  • Q Is this a mandatory roll out of digital meters?
    No. The choice to have a new digital meter installed is entirely yours.

And yet, AGL does not tell you that you have to actively say no in the legal form of a notice letter sent to both AGL the retailer and Energex the distributor. You also have to clearly display this Notice letter near the securely locked meter box.

Unfortunately for consumers, there is a legal argument that by accepting electricity from your provider, there is ‘IMPLIED CONSENT’. You don’t believe me? Read on from the AGL page…

  • Q What if I’m not home – will the installation still go ahead?
    If there is clear access to your meter box, the meter installation will go ahead without you being home.

  • Q I rent my property and not sure if my landlord wants the digital meter installed?
    We do not need permission from the landlord in order to install a digital meter. We can exchange the meter irrespective of whether you are a renter or not.

  • Q Can I change back to an older style meter if I don’t like the digital meter?
    Unfortunately not. Meters cannot be changed after they have been replaced by a digital meter.

So, if you have even the slightest worry about the 50,000 microwatts of non-ionising electro-magnetic frequency radiation – in the form of data radio signals – pouring out of smart meters in regular intervals all day and night in the close proximity of your home, you must act now to stop the installation in your house, office or school. And you must pass this information on to all your loved ones and acquaintances residing in Qld, NSW and SA, as a matter of urgency.

Here are the 11 steps:

  1. Confirm the address of both your retailer and distributor from your bill or website (via the electricity distributor look-up tool). For instance, my retailer is AGL and my distributor is Energex (Energex sells wholesale electricity to AGL)

  2. Write a Notice letter – see my sample in the next blog – and post, by registered post, to both companies, ensuring you get a confirmation reply

  3. Lock up your analogue meter box with a good lock, one that can’t be cut with bolt-cutters

  4. Make the meter data (which belongs to the electricity distributor) accessible to be read

  5. Display a sticker – see the 2 samples

  6. Display a copy of your Notice in a secure weather-proof way

  7. Be wary that it might be called an ‘upgrade’ aka digital/smart meter installation

  8. Stay calm if the electricity meter installer harasses you

  9. Point out that YOU, as the legal occupant, own the meter box itself (renter or landholder) and have taken appropriate legal steps to protect it

  10. Point out that the meter installer is liable for WILFUL AVOIDANCE if he/she continues to attempt to install the ‘digital/smart’ meter against your wishes

  11. You have a common law right to protect your property – the meter box – from trespass. You have the right to resist having your possessions modified, devalued or damaged without consent.

Just to confirm who owns what:

Meter collationTHE ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTOR (e.g. Energex) owns the electricity provided by the retailer (AGL).
THE ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTOR also owns the meter itself and the meter data
THE LEGAL OCCUPANT (RENTER OR LANDHOLDER) owns everything else i.e. the wiring, the fuse panel, the metal box and the underlying building structure

 

If all that makes you feel nervous, compare it to the doubt of having the smart meter there forever more, especially in the light of recent programs like ABC’s Catalyst, highlighting the dangers of Wi-Fi in the form of mobile phones, cordless phones and wireless routers.

In this atmosphere of world-wide doubt and questioning of wireless radiation and its harmful health effects, the electrical companies should not be accelerating their digital smart meter rollout in this underhand way to maximise their profits while they think they still can!

STOP smart meter sign UK

 

stop sign trespass 99kb

 

11

SMART METER WATCH: Victorian Govt regrets smart meter rollout due to poor financial returns

direction of smart meter radiationAn article in the The Australian 17/9/15 augurs well for smart meter opponents, hinting at financial losses by the key stakeholders of the Victorian rollout.

A report by the Victorian Auditor-General, John Doyle, finds that the $2.2 billion government-condoned rollout  from 2006 – 2014 has had profoundly limited financial benefits!

 

While opponents like myself might prefer that any decision be based on HEALTH concerns to all residents, it is still heartening to see that market forces are discouraging any future plans to install this unsafe technology in a technocratic compulsory manner, such as occurred with the unfortunate Victorian ‘guinea pig’ residents.

John Doyle’s report alludes to a 2017 target to have 15% smart meter customers sign up for ‘flexible pricing’. The rationale given for the government’s mandate for this highly corporate rollout was that customers would be better able to keep track of their energy usage so they could choose ‘flexible pricing’ for their needs. In reality, only 0.27% have signed up since 2009, and in the meantime every household has paid for the cost of the smart meter installations via extra charges applied to their power bills.

John Doyle finds in his report that almost 70% of Victorian residents do not have any idea about the so-called benefits of smart meters.

Talk about adding insult to injury! While being microwaved by harmful unacceptably-high EMF radiation emanating from both sides of the smart meter – see image – the resident has also had to pay financially while not understanding or seeking the sudden changes. EMF-aware residents who opposed the installation on their properties were treated appallingly by the power companies, backed up by government threats of punishment. Many residents have developed electro-hypersensitivity syndrome (EHS) since the smart meter installation and have had to flee their homes in the state of Victoria like refugees! Many more are suffering EHS without even knowing the cause of their sudden migraines or chronic fatigue.

Landis and Gyr E350 emanating 50,000 micro watts of harmful EMF Radiation both ways

And all this to give shareholders of Landis and Gyr a massive profit.

Landis and Gyr obtained 56% of the smart meter rort with their digital meter model E350 – see image. But they’re laughing because in 2011 Toshiba bought Landis and Gyr for the amount of US$2.3 billion. Landis and Gyr shareholders include Heinz heir and former chief of APN media group Cameron O’Reilly, John B Fairfax, the Smorgon family and Kerry Stokes.

The public have paid $2.2 billion to subsidise the smart meter rollout in Victoria and any savings have just gone straight back to the power companies who got to sack all the meter readers. The digital smart meters are like radios – they transmit all the data, without the need for meter reading. The problem is that anything that transmits like a radio to that distance has high electro-magnetic frequency Radiation and transmits all day and night without any let-up, up to 200,000 signals every 24 hours. Residents are getting 24/7 non-ionising radiation at unacceptably high levels.

The Australian College of Environmental Science recommends 10 micro-watts as a safe EMF limit in the home, as our bodies cannot be shielded from this type of Radiation. Digital radio-wave smart meters transmit 50,000 micro-watts of non-ionising Radiation!! It’s no wonder people are suddenly developing unexplained migraines!

Considering that Lloyds of London – the biggest insurer in the world – has refused to indemnify payouts for radiation health damage due to mobile phone EMF exposure, the Landis and Gyr shareholders and the Victorian government had better hope there are no costly retrospective lawsuits in the future.

After all, the use of mobile phones is voluntary – albeit ill-informed – and exposes the user to approximately 2,000 micro-watts EMF Radiation. Smart meters were forced upon unaware Victorian residents and now transmit 50,000 micro-watts EMF Radiation in both directions, making them lethal unremitting technological devices peppered throughout the whole state in a scenario not unlike the ASBESTOS debacle.

 

 

 

 

11

GLUTEN: GF Tennis star Djokovic wins again!

Tennis star great, Novak Djokovic, has been practically unbeatable since he got the ‘Gluten-Free’ edge over his competitors. After being diagnosed with Gluten intolerance in 2011, he has followed a strict GF diet turning himself from a good competitor to a ‘super-athlete’, winning again and again in the world tennis titles. Now he has vanquished his old rival Roger Federer in the recent US Open grand slam tournament, rightfully earning him the top spot.

Djokovic slams opposition 2015 US Open final men's singles Grand slam tennic pic

0